| Artwork |
 |
| Film vitals |
|
· Year: 2001
· Director: Earnest Dickerson
· Writer: Adam Simon, Tim Metcalfe
· Cast: Snoop Dogg, Pam Grier
|
| Series info |
|
· May be the first in a franchise.
|
| Information |
|
· Snoop Dogg said that Clint Eastwood's attitude, especially in Westerns such as A Fistful of Dollars, was an inspiration for his portrayal in Bones.
|
| If you liked this, try |
|
|
| Products |
|
Amazon.com
|
| Links |
|
|
|
| Synopsis |
|
In the late seventies, Jimmy Bones, the guardian of his urban neighborhood, is betrayed and murdered. Twenty years later, his spirit is released and he returns to exact vengeance.
|
|
|
|
RATING Out of 100 |
|
46
|
|
| COLD ANALYSIS |
|
ATMOSPHERE
|
|
GORE
|
|
HUMOR
|
|
SCARES
|
|
TENSION
|
Bones is a valiant effort to inject a social conscience into the slasher paradigm, and it's refreshing to review a film whose shortcomings result from it trying too hard instead of not trying at all, as is the case with a lot of movies. A mark of its approach emerges in the fact that Snoop Dogg's undead avenger doesn't really show up until an hour into the movie. I applaud any movie that spends its first two-thirds developing character histories, the plot's background, and the atmosphere that wraps them all up. The setup isn't always interesting, and it's marked by ham-handed supernatural occurrences that come off like second-rate Clive Barker. But it does feature a couple of good actors capable of playing character motivations that run nicely in shades of gray.
And that's why the last half hour of Bones is so irritating. There are glimmers of class here, but they have a hard time shining through the writhing bodies, Dawn of the Dead-style blood, and pools of maggots. The last third of the film depends on the mechanics of the Crow series, but it lacks the sense of tragedy that might make it resemble the amazing first Crow rather than that film's lackluster sequels. Jimmy Bones, also, lacks any sort of tenderness that might endear us to him; his character has come back from the dead and regained a family, but the movie portrays him solely as a remorseless killer. Snoop makes the living Bones a tightly guarded enigma, which is a choice that manages to be simultaneously valid and yet bad for the movie in terms of the approachability the character needs. Moreover, the dead Bones is just evil--there's not even a sense of righteous justice to his murders, because most of his victims aren't even the ones that betrayed him in life. If he was formerly a good man, why isn't he one in death, especially to those who love him? Unless there a Pet Semetary under his brownstone, I don't get it.
|
|