THE COLD SPOT
Search the site

powered by FreeFind
Halloween H20: Twenty Years Later
Artwork
Film vitals
· Year: 1988
· Also known as: Halloween 7, Halloween 7: The Revenge of Laurie Strode, Halloween: The Revenge of Laurie Strode, Halloween: H20, Halloween: H20 (20 Years Later)
· Subgenres: slasher, action
· Director: Steve Miner
· Writers: John Carpenter, Debra Hill
· Cast: Jamie Lee Curtis, Adam Arkin
Series info

Part of the Halloween series.

· Followed by Halloween: Resurrection.
· The film series branches into two story arcs after Halloween II. The first involves films one, two, four, five, and six, and the second counts films one, two, seven, and eight as canon.
· Halloween III does not follow the Michael Myers storyline.
Information
· At one point, a TV in the background shows Scream 2, also written by Kevin Williamson. It was originally to feature Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (starring Mike Myers--get it?), but the deal couldn't be completed in time.
If you liked this, try
Purchase
Amazon.com
· DVD: Extended Edition
· DVD
Links
Synopsis
On Halloween night, 1978, Michael Myers tried and failed to kill his sister Laurie Strode--then disappeared. Now, twenty years later, he's going to try again--but this time Laurie's going to fight back.
ReviewsSUBMIT YOUR REVIEW
Jack Witzig Feb 24, 1999/Aug 9, 2002
RATING
Out of 100
77

COLD ANALYSIS
ATMOSPHERE
GORE
HUMOR
SCARES
TENSION
A truly enjoyable sequel that spins the series into a new direction--using a postmodern angle on events was a good decision, and pretending that every Halloween film since 1981 didn't happen was a great one. H20 doesn't capture the spirit of the first film, but it wasn't meant to; it is much more like a child than a sibling. The result is the first Halloween movie that is actually fun (and that includes the first one, which was terrific, but not really enjoyable). Jamie Lee Curtis shows how much better she's gotten as an actor since 1978, and the writing and directing (the best in the series since Carpenter) are all top-notch. The pacing is snappy, though with a running time of eighty-five minutes, it might have used more deliberation. All criticism aside, H20 is an enjoyable flick that ends in one of the best finales in horror cinema.
Philipp Kneis (philjohn.com - approaching the unexplained) Oct 21, 1999
RATING
Out of 100
2.5 out of 5
No, this one is not a bad sequel. I just ain't great either - it could have been so much better. But at least they tried a back-to-the-roots, reducing the mythology and doing some nasty kills. Jamie Lee Curtis is great, Josh Hartnett could have been better and Adam Arkin, as much as I like him in Chicago Hope, is not making any sense here. Featuring Tippi Hedren [Janet Leigh] is nice, but as cameos come, this cannot really improve the story. A high-school setting, well, that's really something original in the age of Scream et al., but at least the characters are being introduced to let us care for them at least a bit.

H20 comes down to the basics: Gather some teens at Halloween, add Laurie Strode, unleash Michael - and let the bloodbath begin. With Donald Pleasance already dead, Dr. Loomis is missing in this part - which is indeed quite a loss, a loss which cannot be compensated. But that's not the director's fault, how could it be. The movie itself starts somehow promisingly, and this is the only part of the series I had the possibility of watching in the theater, so it had a much different impact. Everything seemed bigger. So I was expecting even more. But when the credits started rolling over the screen, my first reaction to it was: That's it? - Simplicity was mostly understood as brevity in this one. The problem was being taken care of, there was a confrontation between Laurie and Michael, but almost everything was predictable. That's the first mistake. Never give the audience exactly what they want. Except, of course, a great movie.

John Ottman might have written a great horror soundtrack, and how he lets the Halloween Theme appear sounds great. But it isn't the right choice anyway - it defies everything we're used to hear within the series. Don't get me wrong, change might be something positive. But adapting the music to contemporary style was not the right choice at all and contributed to the second mistake: The loss of atmosphere. This movie felt like a more brutal version of Scream, it looked too tidy, too neat - this was being contrasted with quite a risen slasher factor, but also with strange niceties. It doesn't fit, it's like an attempt to assimilate what was unique in Carpenter's creation into the mainstream, without any quest for originality. If there is a next part, if there should be, they would have to resurrect Michael, but, well, he has died countless times now - and has made reappearances time and again; so if there be a next part, they should try to get John Carpenter back into the command chair. Otherwise the series might soon lose both its relevance and distinctiveness

About · Site Map · Submit
© John H. Witzig. This site and its webmaster are in no way responsible for the opinions placed on this site with the exception of reviews written by the webmaster himself. The site and its webmaster are furthermore in no way responsible for the content of any site linked to or from this site. Use of this site indicates acceptance of all regulations listed on the about page.